- 附件::
- 备注:: 直播丨专利分析可视化及图表制作班『3月25-27日』, 2022/3/19
数据可视化的思路
[[专利分析可视化]]
图的前提是有信息
有了信息,之后才是考虑用技术手段快速作图
原始信息→可视化工具对应的信息格式→可视化工具→图表
PPT框架
题目:专利技术层面和战略层面的分析及地图制作技巧 - 专利技术分析的内容和方法 - 专利战略分析的内容和方法 - 专利地图分析常用的指标及数据处理方法 - 数据格式 - 常用指标 - 分析工具 - 分析方法 - 常见的专利分析图制作 - 申请趋势 - 技术构成 - 地域分布 - 专利战略地图的绘制及解读 - 专利技术路线图制作 - Visio制作 - Excalidraw制作 - 专利技术功效图制作 - Excel制作 - R语言制作
原始信息
- 专利检索平台
- 免费
- Espacenet ⭐⭐⭐
- Lens
- Google Patent⭐
- 收费
- Patentics
- Incopat
- 智慧芽
- Derwent Innovation Index(DII)
- 免费
- 法律检索平台
- 免费
- 中国裁判文书网
- 收费
- 北大法宝
- 北大法意
- Westlaw
- [[常用学术网址#^9aa5f9|CaseText]]
- 免费
- 学术检索平台
- [[PPT页面]]
- 商业检索平台
- 工商信息
- 证券信息
信息格式
- 表格
- Excel (xls、xlsx)
- CSV(逗号分隔、制表符分隔、竖线分隔)
- datafram(R语言和Python的分析基础)
- 列表
- JSON(网络数据交换常用格式,最适合javascript可视化工具)
- list(R语言常用)
- 纯文本
- CSV
- txt(纯文本)
- Markdown(轻量化的排版语言,本质是纯文本,可以展示数据的层级关系)
- 思维导图
- Xmind
- Markdown
- Excalidraw | Hand-drawn look & feel • Collaborative • Secure, 2022/3/7
辅助思考
- 描述层次关系
- 气泡网络图
- 树状图
- 思维导图
- 描述对比关系
- 气泡对比图
- 描述流程
- 流程图
- 泳道图
- 甘特图
- 描述方法
- 桥梁图
专利技术分析案例
专利战略分析案例
- 普通图表分析专利军备竞赛
- NPE收购行为分析
- 知识流动、四象限矩阵、网络时间切片
- 聚类、社会网络用于技术机会分析
- (Marco et al., 2019)
- 桑基图
- (Farrukh et al., 2017)
- 技术路线图
- 经济复杂度、聚类图、网络图、排名图、对称坐标图
- (Tang & Tietze)
- (Yip & Ilevbare, 2019)
- (Mitchell et al., 2018)
- (Farrukh et al., 2017)
- 探索专利分析的未来
- (Taminiau & Phaal, 2019)
- (Ringland et al., 2020)
- (Granstrand & Holgersson, 2013)
- 时间线图
- 社会网络
- 动态能力视图
- 象限图
- [[Gartner魔力象限图]]
参考文献
Aristodemou, L., & Tietze, F. (2018). The state-of-the-art on
intellectual property analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial
intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing
intellectual property (IP) data. World Patent Information,
55(7), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.07.002
Farrukh, C., Athanassopoulou, N., & Phaal, R. (2017). Topic
roadmapping and performance dimensions. CTM working paper
series; Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository.
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.13941
Fischer, T., & Henkel, J. (2012). Patent trolls on markets for
technology – an empirical analysis of NPEs’ patent acquisitions.
Research Policy, 41(9), 1519–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.002
Goeldner, M., Herstatt, C., & Tietze, F. (2015). The emergence of
care robotics — a patent and publication analysis. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.005
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2013). Managing the intellectual
property disassembly problem. California Management Review,
55(4), 184–210. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.184
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of
economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
Holgersson, M., Granstrand, O., & Bogers, M. (2018). The evolution
of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering
complementary and substitute appropriability regimes. Long Range
Planning, 51(2), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.007
Hwang, J., Kim, K. H., Hwang, J. G., Jun, S., Yu, J., & Lee, C.
(2020). Technological opportunity analysis: Assistive technology for
blind and visually impaired people. Sustainability,
12(20), 8689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208689
Jell, F., Henkel, J., & Wallin, M. W. (2017). Offensive patent
portfolio races. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 531–549.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.03.003
Lee, C., Kogler, D. F., & Lee, D. (2019). Capturing information on
technology convergence, international collaboration, and knowledge flow
from patent documents: A case of information and communication
technology. Information Processing &
Management, 56(4), 1576–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.09.007
Leonidas, A., & Tietze, F. (2017). Exploring the future of
patent analytics: A technology roadmapping approach. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.13967
Lütjen, H., Schultz, C., Tietze, F., & Urmetzer, F. (2019). Managing
ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view.
Journal of Business Research, 104, 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.001
Marco, A. C., Sarnoff, J. D., & deGrazia, C. A. W. (2019). Patent
claims and patent scope. Research Policy, 48(9),
103790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.014
Mitchell, R., Phaal, R., & Athanassopoulou, N. (2018). Scoring
methods for evaluating and selecting early stage technology and
innovation projects. Apollo - University of Cambridge
Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.21297
Ringland, G., Ilevbare, I., Athanassopoulou, N., Greenaway, A.-M., &
Phaal, R. (2020). Scenarios and roadmapping - how to navigate an
uncertain future. Apollo - University of Cambridge
Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54145
Surana, K., Doblinger, C., Anadon, L. D., & Hultman, N. (2020).
Effects of technology complexity on the emergence and evolution of wind
industry manufacturing locations along global value chains. Nature
Energy, 5(10), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00685-6
Taminiau, P.-T., & Phaal, R. (2019). Financing early stage
innovation ventures – a value-oriented roadmapping framework.
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.46897
Tang, A., & Tietze, F. Intellectual property strategy
trajectory: A new visualisation approach. Apollo - University
of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.75500
Yip, M. H., & Ilevbare, I. (2019). Early stage new product and
service design process - the use of graphical representations.
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35690
Yu, X., & Zhang, B. (2019). Obtaining advantages from technology
revolution: A patent roadmap for competition analysis and strategy
planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
145, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.008